top of page

louisa williams, ND


Not Willing to Wait

I have gotten some critical feedback from my latest newsletter and blog post from readers asking how do I know for sure that the swabs, masks, and COVID shots have graphene oxide in them?

Well, the answer is, I don’t, and no one else does for sure either. But in this current totalitarian climate I’m just not willing to wait—or delay needed treatment—until the powers that be can actually perform an independent and unbiased investigation.

The crucial question during these turbulent times is who can you turn to for the truth? For example, none of the COVID shots are supposed to contain aluminum—the most common adjuvant in children’s vaccines. | 1 | However, an analysis conducted by Dr. Robert Young found that this neurotoxic metal wa contaminating both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots. | 2 | He and his team additionally discovered that nickel, a major allergen and carcinogen, was found in the Astra Zeneca mRNA shot and the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) vaccine. | 3 | Further, all the COVID shots were found by the Spanish organization La Quinta Columna to contain “a considerable dose of graphene oxide nanoparticles,” and this assertion was further confirmed by former Pfizer analyst Karen Kingston. | 4 | | 5 | However, with this lack of transparency into what is being directly injected into almost two-thirds of the world’s population, is it any wonder that mainstream media, pharmaceutical companies, and the current regime in power do not address the potential toxicity of the COVID tests? Where does the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) stand on this important issue? What about a CDC or FDA—the two agencies charged with protecting us from toxins in our food and drugs—investigation into these charges? Or how about a Harvard or Yale University research study into the effect of potentially contaminated swabs thrust deeply up into the nasal mucosa? As we know historically these altruistic actions in the name of science would be rare indeed based on the stranglehold that Big Pharma has had in this country for over a century. But in this current political climate of governmental mandates and shutdowns, it’s the last thing that’s going to happen.

In my own clinical experience over the past two years I have witnessed healthy patients who had been doing quite well on their holistic protocols get acutely sick after these COVID tests. Whether it’s two weeks of headaches and shortness of breath, a few months of loss of taste and smell and some memory loss, or a sore and raspy throat after swabs were used in the mouth—the reactions immediately after these COVID nasal and oral tests have been notable and impossible to ignore.

However, for those who don’t believe the numerous reports of graphene oxide being found in the COVID swab tests, masks, and vaccines, it’s important to point out that in any case these swabs are not completely harmless—that is, they are not made from organic cotton and purchased from the health food store! For decades cotton has been notorious to be one of the most heavily sprayed crops in the world. | 6 | The reactive halogen chlorine, the most commonly-used bleaching agent employed to whiten cotton, releases chemical residues known as dioxins that have been found to settle and remain, often permanently, in the fat cells of humans and animals (a fact that has caused many women to smartly switch to organic cotton tampons). | 7 | | 8 | Finally, although governmental agencies insist that only ethylene oxide is used to sterilize these nasal and oral swabs and that this chemical leaves behind no toxic residues, it is difficult to trust the pharmaceutical manufacturing laboratories that are currently producing this highly profitable product in massive amounts. In industrial settings ethylene oxide exposure has been found to trigger acute nausea, vomiting, neurological disorders, and pulmonary infections. | 9 | | 10 | Microdoses from the residues of this toxic chemical may cause less intense but nevertheless significant symptoms, however this is another one of the many issues that needs to be investigated through independent and non-biased research studies.

In conclusion, even if you don’t believe that graphene oxide has been added to these swabs, the beauty of activated charcoal is that it has an extremely broad range of adsorptive ability and has been proven to bind any toxin—whether it be a chemical, metal, or a pathogenic microbe—over the centuries of its use. | 11 | So using this very safe activated charcoal detox procedure after a COVID PCR or antigen test certainly does no harm, and it can potentially do a lot of good by quickly adsorbing any type of toxic residues remaining in the nasal mucosa, before these xenobiotics can move into the brain.

Based on clinical observations as well as my energetic testing method, I do believe there is significant toxicity in these swab tests and that graphene oxide and possibly other contaminants are making many of my patients sick after undergoing them. Hopefully someday all will be revealed through reliable sources we can trust when we live in a fair and representative democracy again. Meanwhile I am happy to report that although it is a small clinical sample, my patients who have been forced to take these COVID tests and are utilizing this ABC protocol to quickly reduce any residues left in their nose (nasal swab test) or mouth (oral swab test), are currently experiencing significantly less reactions and symptoms afterwards.



1, p. 9.


3 Ibid










Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page